ARROW FINANCIAL CORP
For the period ended Dec 31, 2025. Filed Mar 6, 2026.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's yearly report to the SEC, with audited financial statements. It is the fullest account a company gives of its business, its finances and the risks it sees.
FY2025 · Filed Mar 6, 2026
AROW$38.47-0.4%Stored close · as of Nov 6, 2026
What changed in Risk Factors?
Read the current filingPrevious report: 10-K
Period ended 2024-12-31; filed 2025-03-14.
0000717538-25-000023
Item 1A. Risk FactorsCurrent report: 10-K
Period ended 2025-12-31; filed 2026-03-06.
0000717538-26-000037
Item 1A. Risk FactorsThe baseline is this issuer’s latest earlier reporting period of the same form that was filed before the current report. A previous 10-Q is a different quarter, not a year-over-year comparison. Amendments are excluded.
Compared 35 previous paragraphs and 45 current paragraphs.
21 unchanged; 8 reworded; 16 added; 6 removed; 0 previous and 0 current paragraphs rearranged.
Tables are not compared: 0 previous and 0 current tables excluded. Dates, whitespace, punctuation and numbering changes are ignored; changes to financial figures remain significant.
A changed paragraph is not evidence that risk increased or decreased. An unchanged paragraph does not establish that risk stayed the same.
Added paragraphs (16)
Current report
In particular the use or implementation of artificial intelligence (AI) applications and generative AI technologies are a recent example of an emerging technology providing significant value to operations and service that also present additional risks for consideration. AI models may rely on complex algorithms and vast datasets. Errors, biases, or generating false information in these models, or unexpected system failures, could lead to flawed decisions, financial losses, compliance failures, or degraded customer experiences, impacting profitability and client retention. AI systems also may process sensitive customer data, and security breaches or unauthorized access to these systems could result in data theft, loss of intellectual property, and significant penalties and damages to customer trust. In addition to risks associated with direct adoption of AI applications by us, we face the risk of associates utilizing unauthorized publicly sourced AI tools to complete business functions. Unauthorized use of AI tools could lead to the unintended exposure of confidential data, use of inaccurate results, and a number of other risks. Additionally, third-party service providers are quickly embedding AI capabilities in their technology to provide more robust and efficient services. Some embedded AI capabilities could risk the exposure of confidential company data if being used in a multi-tenant environment or being used to train AI systems. Arrow is still evaluating the potential threats and uses of this technology.
Current report
Geopolitical and other external events, such as severe weather, natural disasters, public health emergencies and pandemics, acts of war or terrorism, and other external events could impact Arrow Bank’s ability to conduct business. Financial institutions have been, and continue to be, targets of terrorist threats aimed at compromising operating and communication systems. Such events could cause significant damage, impact the stability of our facilities and result in additional expenses, impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, reduce the value of collateral securing repayment of our loans, and result in the loss of revenue. Arrow Bank may also be affected by severe weather events or public health emergencies. While we have established and regularly test disaster recovery procedures, the occurrence of any such event could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations and financial condition. Additionally, financial markets may be adversely affected by the actual or anticipated impact of military conflict, terrorism or other geopolitical events, including trade disputes.
Current report
The market price of Arrow’s common stock may decline as a result of the Merger. The market price of Arrow’s common stock may decline as a result of the Merger if Arrow does not achieve the perceived benefits of the Merger or the effect of the Merger on Arrow’s financial results is not consistent with the expectations of financial or industry analysts.
Current report
In addition, the consummation of the Merger will result in the combination of two companies that currently operate as independent companies. While Arrow expects to benefit from certain synergies following the Merger, Arrow may also encounter new risks and liabilities associated with these differences. Following the Merger, shareholders of Arrow and Adirondack will own interests in a combined company operating an expanded business and may not wish to continue to invest in Arrow, or for other reasons may wish to dispose of some or all of Arrow’s common stock. If, following the effective time of the Merger, large amounts of Arrow’s common stock are sold, the price of Arrow’s common stock could decline.
Current report
Combining Arrow and Adirondack may be more difficult, costly or time-consuming than expected, and Arrow may fail to realize the anticipated benefits of the Merger. The benefits and synergies expected to result from the proposed Merger will depend in part on whether the operations of Adirondack can be integrated in a timely and efficient manner with those of Arrow. Arrow will face challenges and costs in consolidating its functions with those of Adirondack, and integrating the organizations, procedures and operations of the two businesses. The integration of Arrow and Adirondack will be complex and time-consuming, and the management of both companies will have to dedicate substantial time and resources to it. Failure to successfully integrate the operations of Arrow and Adirondack could result in the failure to achieve some of the anticipated benefits from the transaction, including cost savings and other operating efficiencies.
Current report
The Agreement may be terminated in accordance with its terms and the Merger may not be completed. The Agreement is subject to a number of conditions which must be fulfilled in order to complete the Merger. Those conditions include, among other things: (i) approval of the Agreement by the requisite vote of the shareholders of Adirondack (ii) authorization for listing on Nasdaq of the shares of Arrow’s common stock to be issued in the Merger, (iii) receipt of required regulatory approvals, including the approval of the Federal Reserve Board, the OCC and the New York State Department of Financial Services, without the imposition of any condition or restriction that would be reasonably expected to have a material adverse effect on the continuing corporation and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, after giving effect to the Merger and the Bank Merger, (iv) effectiveness of the registration statement on Form S-4 for Arrow’s common stock to be issued in the Merger, and (v) the absence of any order, injunction, decree or other legal restraint preventing the completion of the Merger, the Bank Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger agreement or making the completion of the Merger, the Bank Merger or any of the other transactions contemplated by the Merger agreement illegal. Each party’s obligation to complete the Merger is also subject to certain additional customary conditions, including (a) subject to certain exceptions, the accuracy of the representations and warranties of the other party, (b) performance in all material respects by the other party of its obligations under the Merger agreement, and (c) receipt by such party of an opinion from its counsel to the effect that the Merger will qualify as a “reorganization” within the meaning of Section 368(a) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. In addition, Arrow’s obligation to complete the Merger is also subject to holders of fewer than 5% of the outstanding shares of Adirondack’s common stock perfecting their appraisal rights under appliable New York law.
Current report
These conditions to the closing may not be fulfilled in a timely manner or at all, and, accordingly, the Merger may not be completed. In addition, the parties can mutually decide to terminate the Merger agreement at any time, before or after the requisite vote of the shareholders of Adirondack or Arrow, Arrow Merger Sub, Inc., or Adirondack Inc. may elect to terminate the Merger agreement in certain other circumstances.
Current report
Additionally, Arrow has incurred and will incur substantial expenses in connection with the negotiation and completion of the transactions contemplated by the Merger agreement, as well as the costs and expenses of preparing, filing, printing and mailing of a joint proxy statement/prospectus in connection with the Merger, and all filing and other fees paid in connection with the Merger. If the Merger is not completed, Arrow would have to pay these expenses without realizing the expected benefits of the Merger.
Current report
Arrow Bank is subject to risks and losses resulting from fraudulent activities that could adversely impact its financial performance and results of operations. As a bank, we are susceptible to fraudulent activity that may be committed against us or our clients, which may result in financial losses or increased costs to us or our clients, disclosure or misuse of our information or our client information, misappropriation of assets, privacy breaches against our clients, litigation or damage to our reputation. Arrow Bank is most subject to fraud and compliance risk in connection with the origination of loans, ACH transactions, wire transactions, ATM transactions, checking transactions, and debit cards that we have issued to customers and through online banking portals.
Current report
In addition, Arrow Bank must maintain sufficient funds to respond to the needs of depositors and borrowers. Deposits have traditionally been our primary source of funds for use in lending and investment activities. Arrow Bank also receives funds from loan repayments, investment maturities and income on other interest-earning assets. While we emphasize generating transaction accounts, we cannot guarantee if and when this will occur. Further, the considerable competition for deposits in our market area also has made, and may continue to make, it difficult for us to obtain reasonably priced deposits.
Current report
Arrow Bank’s commercial and commercial real estate loans increase its exposure to credit risks. At December 31, 2025, Arrow’s commercial and commercial real estate loans totaled $984 million, or 29% of total loans. We plan to continue to emphasize the origination of these types of loans, which generally expose us to a greater risk of nonpayment and loss than residential real estate or consumer loans because repayment of such loans often depends on the successful business operations and income stream of the borrowers and are generally more sensitive to economic conditions. Additionally, such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to consumer loans or residential real estate loans, and the collateral securing such loans often cannot be liquidated as easily as residential real estate. A sudden downturn in the economy, or a prolonged downturn for specific industries, could result in borrowers being unable to repay their loans, thus exposing Arrow to increased credit risk.
Current report
Arrow Bank’s indirect and consumer lending involves risk elements in addition to normal credit risk. At December 31, 2025, Arrow Bank’s consumer loans totaled $1,076 million, or 33% of total loans. A portion of such lending involves the purchase of consumer automobile installment sales contracts from automobile dealers located throughout New York and Vermont. These loans are for the purchase of new or used automobiles. Arrow Bank serves customers that cover a range of creditworthiness, and the required terms and rates are reflective of those risk profiles. While these loans have higher yields than many of our other loans, such loans involve risk elements in addition to normal credit risk. Additional risk elements associated with indirect lending include the limited personal contact with the borrower as a result of indirect lending through non-bank channels, namely automobile dealers. While indirect automobile loans are secured, such loans are secured by depreciating assets and characterized by loan-to-value ratios that could result in us not recovering the full value of an outstanding loan upon default by the borrower. State and federal laws may further limit our ability to recover outstanding principal balances on such loans. If the losses from our indirect loan portfolio are higher than anticipated, it could have a material adverse effect on Arrow Bank’s financial condition and results of operations.
Current report
Arrow may not pay or may reduce the dividends paid on shares of its common stock, and its ability to pay dividends is subject to certain restrictions. Holders of Arrow common stock are only entitled to receive such dividends as our Board of Directors may declare out of funds legally available for such payments. In addition, Arrow is a bank holding company, and its ability to declare and pay dividends is dependent on federal regulatory considerations, including the guidelines of the Federal Reserve regarding capital adequacy and dividends. Although we have historically declared cash dividends on our common stock, we are not required to do so and may reduce or eliminate our common stock dividend in the future. Any change in the level of our dividends or the suspension of the payment thereof could have an adverse effect on the market price of our common stock.
Current report
Applicable laws and regulations restrict our lending practices, require us to expend substantial additional resources to ensure compliance, and subject Arrow Bank to minimum capital requirements which, in the long run, may serve as a drag on its earnings, growth and ultimately on our dividends and stock price. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the adequacy of the level of our allowance for loan losses. If, as a result of an examination, a federal banking agency were to determine that our financial condition, capital resources, asset quality, earnings prospects, management, liquidity or other aspects of any of our operations had become unsatisfactory, or that we were in violation of any law or regulation, it may take a number of different remedial actions as it deems appropriate. These actions include the power to enjoin “unsafe or unsound” practices, to require affirmative action to correct any conditions resulting from any violation or practice, to issue an administrative order that can be judicially enforced, to direct an increase in our capital, to restrict our growth or merger activity, to assess civil monetary penalties against our officers or directors, to remove officers and directors and, if it is concluded that such conditions cannot be corrected or there is an imminent risk of loss to depositors, to terminate our deposit insurance or to place Arrow Bank into receivership or conservatorship.
Removed paragraphs (6)
Previous report
Health emergencies may adversely affect Arrow’s business activities, financial condition and results of operations. The business of Arrow and its subsidiaries depends on the willingness and ability of its customers to conduct financial transactions. Health emergencies could disrupt the business, activities, and operations of Arrow’s customers, as well as Arrow's business and operations.
Previous report
Arrow has taken steps to mitigate the risk of harm to its employees and customers and to its operations from health emergencies or other events through its business continuity plan. If a health emergency has an adverse effect on (i) customer deposits, (ii) the ability of borrowers to satisfy their obligations, (iii) the demand for loans or other financial products and services, (iv) the ability of Arrow’s personnel and third party service providers to perform effectively, (v) financial markets, real estate markets, or economic growth, or (vi) other aspects of operations, then Arrow’s liquidity, financial condition and/or results of operations may be materially and adversely affected.
Previous report
Arrow may not realize the anticipated benefits of unifying its two former subsidiary banks into one bank. On December 31, 2024, Arrow merged its two former subsidiary banks into one subsidiary bank, and changed the name of the unified institution to Arrow Bank. Arrow anticipates the unification will simplify the bank’s brand identity, strengthen its market presence, create operational efficiencies, and enhance Arrow's ability to pursue its strategic growth objectives; however, Arrow could experience additional costs associated with rebranding and integrating operations, disruptions to company operations, or a loss of customers or brand awareness, any of which could have a material impact on our operations.
Previous report
The Company relies on the operations of its subsidiaries to provide liquidity, which, if limited, could impact Arrow's ability to pay dividends to its shareholders or to repurchase its common stock. Arrow is a single bank holding company, a separate legal entity from its subsidiaries. The bank holding company does not have significant operations of its own. The ability of the subsidiaries, including Arrow Bank and the insurance subsidiary, to pay dividends is limited by various statutes and regulations. It is possible, depending upon the financial condition of Arrow's subsidiaries and other factors, that the subsidiaries might be restricted at some point in the ability to pay dividends to Arrow, including by a bank regulator asserting that the payment of such dividends or other payments would constitute an unsafe or unsound practice. In addition, under federal banking law, Arrow is subject to consolidated capital requirements at the holding company level. If Arrow or Arrow Bank is required to retain or increase capital, Arrow may not be able to maintain the cash dividends or pay dividends at all, or to repurchase shares of Arrow's common stock.
Previous report
Arrow Bank's depositor/customer awareness of the changing regulatory environment is particularly true of the set of laws and regulations under Dodd-Frank, which were passed in the aftermath of the 2008-09 financial crisis and in large part were intended to better protect bank customers (and to some degree, banks) against a wide variety of lending products and aggressive lending practices that pre-dated the crisis and are seen as having contributed to its severity. Although not all banks offered such products or engaged in such practices, all banks are affected by these laws and regulations to some degree.
Previous report
Dodd-Frank restricts Arrow Bank's lending practices, requires us to expend substantial additional resources to safeguard customers, significantly increases its regulatory burden, and subjects Arrow Bank to significantly higher minimum capital requirements which, in the long run, may serve as a drag on its earnings, growth and ultimately on its dividends and stock price (the Dodd-Frank capital standards are separately addressed in a previous risk factor).
Reworded paragraphs (8)
Previous wording
Arrow remains subject to inflationary risk which could adversely impact our business and our customers. Beginning in the first half of 2022, the FRB steadily increased in benchmark interest rates in response to signs of growing inflation. Although the FRB cut certain benchmark interest rates twice in the second half of 2024, the inflationary outlook remains uncertain. Should interest rates rise, the value of our investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, would likely decrease (although this effect may be mitigated for floating rate instruments). Further, continued inflation increases the cost of operational expenses which increases our noninterest expenses. Additionally, our customers may be affected by inflation, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay loans. Finally, a return to a higher inflationary environment may discourage our customers from pursuing new loans.
Current wording
Arrow remains subject to inflationary risk which could adversely impact our business and our customers. Beginning in the first half of 2022, the FRB steadily increased in benchmark interest rates in response to signs of growing inflation. Although the FRB cut certain benchmark interest rates twice in the second half of 2024 and again in 2025, the inflationary outlook remains uncertain. Should interest rates rise, the value of our investment securities, particularly those with longer maturities, would likely decrease (although this effect may be mitigated for floating rate instruments). Further, continued inflation increases the cost of operational expenses which increases our noninterest expenses. Additionally, our customers may be affected by inflation, which could have a negative impact on their ability to repay loans. Finally, a higher inflationary environment may discourage our customers from pursuing new loans.
Previous wording
The financial services industry is faced with technological advances and changes on a continuing basis, and failure to adapt to these advances and changes could have a material adverse impact on Arrow's business. Technological advances and changes in the financial services industry are pervasive and constant. The retail financial services sector, like many other retail goods and services sectors, is constantly evolving, involving new delivery and communications systems and technologies that are extraordinarily far-reaching and impactful. For Arrow to remain competitive, Arrow must adapt to these systems and technologies. Proper implementation of new technologies can increase efficiency, decrease costs and help to meet customer demand. However, many competitors have greater resources to invest in technological advances and changes. Arrow may not always be successful in utilizing the latest technological advances in offering its products and services or in otherwise conducting its business. Failure to identify, consider, adapt to and implement technological advances and changes could have a material adverse effect on business. In particular the use or implementation of AI and generative AI technologies can have a significant impact. Arrow is still evaluating the potential threats and uses of this technology.
Current wording
The financial services industry is faced with technological advances and changes on a continuing basis, and failure to adapt to these advances and changes could have a material adverse impact on Arrow's business. Technological advances and changes in the financial services industry are pervasive and constant. The retail financial services sector, like many other retail goods and services sectors, is constantly evolving, involving new delivery and communications systems and technologies that are extraordinarily far-reaching and impactful. For Arrow to remain competitive, Arrow must adapt to these systems and technologies. Proper implementation of new technologies can increase efficiency, decrease costs and help to meet customer demand. However, many competitors have greater resources to invest in technological advances and changes. Arrow may not always be successful in utilizing the latest technological advances in offering its products and services or in otherwise conducting its business. Failure to identify, consider, adapt to and implement technological advances and changes could have a material adverse effect on business.
Previous wording
Arrow Bank's allowance for possible credit losses may be insufficient, and an increase in the allowance would reduce earnings. Arrow Bank's loan quality is affected by the condition of the economy. Like other financial institutions, Arrow Bank maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for probable credit losses at the balance sheet date. While Arrow Bank has continued to enjoy a very high level of quality in its loan portfolio generally and very low levels of loan charge-offs and non-performing loans, if the economy in Arrow Bank's geographic market area should deteriorate to the point that recessionary conditions return, or if the regional or national economy experiences a protracted period of stagnation, the quality of our loan portfolio may weaken so significantly that its allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual or expected loan losses. In such events, Arrow Bank may be required to increase its provisions for credit losses and this could materially and adversely affect financial results. The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for credit losses based on management’s evaluation of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio and the general economy. The allowance for credit losses is based upon a number of factors, including the size of the loan portfolio, asset classifications, economic trends, industry experience and trends, industry and geographic concentrations, estimated collateral values, management’s assessment of the credit risk inherent in the portfolio, historical loss experience and loan underwriting policies. In addition, Arrow Bank evaluates all loans identified as problem loans and augments the allowance based upon an estimation of the potential loss associated with those problem loans. Additions to the allowance for credit losses decrease net income through provisions for credit losses. Arrow Bank's regulators, in reviewing the loan portfolio as part of a regulatory examination, may from time to time require Arrow Bank to increase the allowance for credit losses, thereby negatively affecting earnings, financial condition and capital ratios at that time. Moreover, additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions, new information regarding existing loans and leases, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of Arrow's control. Additions to the allowance could have a negative impact on Arrow Bank's results of operations, which would impact the Company's results of operations.
Current wording
Arrow Bank's allowance for expected credit losses may be insufficient, and an increase in the allowance would reduce earnings. Arrow Bank's loan quality is affected by the condition of the economy. Like other financial institutions, Arrow Bank maintains an allowance for credit losses to provide for expected credit losses at the balance sheet date. While Arrow Bank has continued to enjoy a very high level of quality in its loan portfolio generally and very low levels of loan charge-offs and non-performing loans, if the economy in Arrow Bank's geographic market area should deteriorate to the point that recessionary conditions return, or if the regional or national economy experiences a protracted period of stagnation, the quality of our loan portfolio may weaken so significantly that its allowance for loan losses may not be adequate to cover actual or expected loan losses. In such events, Arrow Bank may be required to increase its provisions for credit losses and this could materially and adversely affect financial results. The allowance for credit losses is established through a provision for credit losses based on management’s evaluation of the risks inherent in the loan portfolio and the general economy. The allowance for credit losses is based upon a number of factors, including the size of the loan portfolio, asset classifications, economic trends, industry experience and trends, industry and geographic concentrations, estimated collateral values, management’s assessment of the credit risk inherent in the portfolio, historical loss experience and loan underwriting policies. In addition, Arrow Bank evaluates all loans identified as problem loans and augments the allowance based upon an estimation of the potential loss associated with those problem loans. Additions to the allowance for credit losses decrease net income through provisions for credit losses. Arrow Bank's regulators, in reviewing the loan portfolio as part of a regulatory examination, may from time to time require Arrow Bank to increase the allowance for credit losses, thereby negatively affecting earnings, financial condition and capital ratios at that time. Moreover, additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and real estate market conditions, new information regarding existing loans and leases, identification of additional problem loans and other factors, both within and outside of Arrow's control. Additions to the allowance could have a negative impact on Arrow Bank's results of operations, which would impact the Company's results of operations.
Previous wording
Arrow’s financial condition and the results of its operations could be negatively impacted by changes in its liquidity position. Arrow’s liquidity can be significantly and negatively impacted by factors outside the Company’s control, including general disruptions in the financial markets, governmental fiscal and monetary policies, regulatory changes, negative investor perceptions of Arrow’s creditworthiness, unexpected increases in cash or collateral requirements and the consequent inability to monetize available liquidity resources. Further, competition for deposits has continued to increase in recent years, including as a result of online banks and digital banking and fixed income alternatives for customer funds. Continued or increased competition for deposits in the current higher interest rate environment could negatively impact Arrow’s liquidity going forward.
Current wording
Arrow’s financial condition and the results of its operations could be negatively impacted by changes in its liquidity position. Arrow’s liquidity can be significantly and negatively impacted by factors outside the Company’s control, including general disruptions in the financial markets, governmental fiscal and monetary policies, regulatory changes, negative investor perceptions of Arrow’s creditworthiness, unexpected increases in cash or collateral requirements and the consequent inability to monetize available liquidity resources.
Previous wording
In addition, as a holding company, Arrow relies on interest, dividends, distributions and other payments from Arrow Bank to fund dividends as well as to satisfy its debt and other obligations. Limitations on the payments that Arrow receives from Arrow Bank could also impact Arrow’s liquidity. A bank holding company is required by law to act as a source of financial and managerial strength for Arrow Bank. As a result, Arrow may be required to commit resources to Arrow Bank, even if doing so is not otherwise in the interests of the Company, its shareholders or its creditors, which could reduce the amount of funds available to meet its obligations.
Current wording
As a holding company, Arrow relies on interest, dividends, distributions and other payments from Arrow Bank to fund dividends as well as to satisfy its debt and other obligations. Limitations on the payments that Arrow receives from Arrow Bank could also impact Arrow’s liquidity. A bank holding company is required by law to act as a source of financial and managerial strength for Arrow Bank. As a result, Arrow may be required to commit resources to Arrow Bank, even if doing so is not otherwise in the interests of the Company, its shareholders or its creditors, which could reduce the amount of funds available to meet its obligations.
Previous wording
Federal banking statutes and regulations could change in the future, which may adversely affect Arrow. Arrow Bank is subject to extensive federal and state banking regulations and supervision. Banking laws and regulations are intended primarily to protect bank depositors’ funds (and indirectly the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund) as well as bank retail customers, who may lack the sophistication to understand or appreciate bank products and services. These laws and regulations generally are not, however, aimed at protecting or enhancing the returns on investment enjoyed by bank shareholders.
Current wording
Arrow operates in a highly regulated industry and face risks associated with noncompliance. Federal banking statutes and regulations could change in the future, which may adversely affect Arrow. Arrow and Arrow Bank are subject to extensive federal and state banking regulations and supervision. Banking laws and regulations are intended primarily to protect bank depositors’ funds (and indirectly the Federal Deposit Insurance Fund) as well as bank retail customers, who may lack the sophistication to understand or appreciate bank products and services. These laws and regulations generally are not, however, aimed at protecting or enhancing the returns on investment enjoyed by bank shareholders.
Previous wording
Although the Economic Growth Act and similar initiatives may mitigate the impact of Dodd-Frank, other statutory and regulatory changes including additional guidance and interpretations of existing rules and requirements could add to the existing regulatory burden imposed on banking organizations like Arrow Bank, resulting in a potential material adverse effect on Arrow's financial condition and results of operations.
Current wording
Future statutory and regulatory changes, including additional guidance and interpretations of existing rules and requirements, are difficult to predict and could add to the existing regulatory burden imposed on banking organizations like Arrow Bank, resulting in a potential material adverse effect on Arrow's financial condition and results of operations.
Previous wording
Capital and liquidity standards require banks and bank holding companies to maintain more and higher quality capital and greater liquidity than has historically been the case. Capital standards, particularly those adopted as a result of Dodd-Frank, continue to have a significant effect on banks and bank holding companies, including Arrow. The need to maintain more and higher quality capital, as well as greater liquidity, and generally increased regulatory scrutiny with respect to liquidity and capital levels, may at some point limit business activities, including lending, and our ability to expand. It could also result in Arrow being required to take steps to increase regulatory capital and may dilute shareholder value or limit the ability to pay dividends or otherwise return capital to investors through stock repurchases. The Capital Rules promulgated under Dodd-Frank will remain applicable to Arrow.
Current wording
Capital and liquidity standards require banks and bank holding companies to maintain more and higher quality capital and greater liquidity than has historically been the case. Capital standards, particularly those adopted as a result of Dodd-Frank, continue to have a significant effect on banks and bank holding companies, including Arrow. The need to maintain more and higher quality capital, as well as greater liquidity, and generally increased regulatory scrutiny with respect to liquidity and capital levels, may at some point limit business activities, including lending, and our ability to expand. It could also result in Arrow being required to take steps to increase regulatory capital and may dilute shareholder value or limit the ability to pay dividends or otherwise return capital to investors through stock repurchases.