THOMAS INDUSTRIES INC TII (last ticker on record)
CIK 97886Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Bryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 471 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Cummings & LockwoodFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Greenebaum Doll & McDonaldFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Ogden Newell & WelchFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 3.54× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Bryan Cave | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 471 | 1.09 | 0.76 | 0.98 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Cummings & Lockwood | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 29 | 1.07 | 0.49 | 2.03 |
| Greenebaum Doll & McDonald | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 24 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
| Ogden Newell & Welch | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 3.54 | 0.00 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- SCOTT N. GIERKEMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.78×
- Christopher E. AustinCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Denis P. McCuskerBryan CaveFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 1.30× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCOTT N. GIERKEMcDermott Will & Emery | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 2.25 | 0.00 | 2.78 |
| Christopher E. AustinCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 24 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.76 |
| Denis P. McCuskerBryan Cave | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 12 | 1.73 | 1.30 | 1.44 |