TEXAS INDUSTRIES INC TXI (last ticker on record)
CIK 97472Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked May 2014 · Named in a filing · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2003 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | May 2014 | Named in a filing | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.23 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.82 |
| Thompson & Knight | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.30 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.04 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2003 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- George F. SchoenCravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.35×
- Scott A. BarshayPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Jul 2014 · Named in a filing · 57 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Joe DannenmaierThompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.21×
- VAN M. JOLASLocke LordFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| George F. SchoenCravath Swaine & Moore | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.35 |
| Scott A. BarshayPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Jul 2014 | Named in a filing | 57 | 1.66 | 0.00 | 0.54 |
| Joe DannenmaierThompson & Knight | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 17 | 0.40 | 0.00 | 1.21 |
| VAN M. JOLASLocke Lord | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.00 |