TEREX CORP TEX (last ticker on record)

CIK 97216Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Delisting notice (not a red flag)
SEC/DOJ scrutiny

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Dec 2007
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 9; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 10; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

Aug 12, 2009SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Aug 12, 2009An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Aug 1, 2008A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
Apr 7, 2008An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Dec 31, 2007An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
Feb 17, 2006A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q/A (opens in a new tab)
Dec 16, 2005Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Sep 9, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 29, 2005A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 29, 2005A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 4, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 13, 2005Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 20, 1999SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Apr 20, 1999SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
Apr 20, 1999SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Davis Polk	Dec 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	1,694	1.26	0.06	1.02
Pryor Cashman	Aug 2023	Named in a filing	229	1.28	1.25	1.28
Bryan Cave	Oct 2002	Named in SEC correspondence	471	1.09	0.76	0.98
Fried Frank	Jul 2001	Named in SEC correspondence	540	1.33	0.24	0.94
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Jan 1996	Named in a filing	2,607	1.15	0.19	0.85
Robinson Silverman Pearce Aronsohn & Berman LLP	Dec 1995	Named in SEC correspondence	34	1.40	2.62	1.40
Kramer Levin Naftalis	Sep 2003	Text search only	304	0.95	0.68	1.16
Kirkland & Ellis	Jul 2001	Text search only	1,686	0.98	0.17	0.87
Morgan Lewis	Jul 2001	Text search only	1,028	1.18	0.31	1.02

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Joshua T. ColemanFried Frank	Jul 2026	Named in a filing	7	0.00	0.00	0.00
Evan RosenDavis Polk	Dec 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	16	1.03	0.00	1.17
James P. DoughertyDavis Polk	Dec 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	22	0.38	0.00	1.40
Philip RichterFried Frank	Dec 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	44	1.54	0.00	1.65
Stuart H. GelfondFried Frank	Jul 2007	Named in a filing	50	1.09	0.00	1.01
DAVID FISHERBryan Cave	Sep 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	5	1.00	9.38	0.61
Steven G. ScheinfeldFried Frank	Jul 2001	Named in a filing	9	2.07	0.00	1.04
Herbert J. Huff	Feb 1996	Named in a filing	38	2.00	0.00	0.50
Eric J. FriedmanSkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP	Oct 2002	Text search only	15	1.34	0.00	1.34
Stephen FraidinCadwalader Wickersham & Taft	Jul 2001	Text search only	26	1.21	0.00	1.18