TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C.
CIK 97142Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Bracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 247 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2009 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bracewell LLP | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 247 | 0.93 | 0.31 | 0.96 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.59 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.26 |
| Fried Frank | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.32 | 0.24 | 0.86 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2009 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles StillBracewell LLPFirst linked Mar 2009 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- David F. TaylorLocke LordFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.52× · Went dark 1.10× · 95% wipeout 2.48×
- Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Sep 1998 · Named in a filing · 67 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Stuart H. GelfondFried FrankFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 50 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- GARY P. COOPERSTEINFried FrankFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.32× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles StillBracewell LLP | Mar 2009 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.31 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| David F. TaylorLocke Lord | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.52 | 1.10 | 2.48 |
| Michael O LearyAndrews Kurth LLP | Sep 1998 | Named in a filing | 67 | 1.30 | 0.56 | 1.04 |
| Stuart H. GelfondFried Frank | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 50 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.97 |
| GARY P. COOPERSTEINFried Frank | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.32 | 0.00 | 1.60 |