RS Legacy Corp RSH (last ticker on record)
CIK 96289Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Feb 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jul 2007 to Jan 2015
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Holland & HartFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Cantey & Hanger, L.L.P.First linked May 2006 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.62× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Squire Sanders (US)First linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 199 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 0.98× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Fried FrankFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 540 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Satterlee Stephens LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.33× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Jones DayFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Holland & Hart | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Hunton & Williams | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Thompson & Knight | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Cantey & Hanger, L.L.P. | May 2006 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.62 | 0.00 | 1.12 |
| Haynes and Boone | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Squire Sanders (US) | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 199 | 0.88 | 0.98 | 1.13 |
| Fried Frank | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 540 | 1.33 | 0.24 | 0.94 |
| Satterlee Stephens LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 35 | 1.33 | 0.36 | 1.31 |
| Jones Day | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.52× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
- Robert P. BellFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- David E. MorrisonFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
- Garrett A. DeVriesAkin GumpFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.04×
- ROBERT R. KIBBYHaynes and BooneFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Fred A. SummerSquire Sanders (US)First linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.53× · Went dark 4.25× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Stephen I. GloverGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLPFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.39× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Dwight A. KinseyDuane MorrisFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Dec 2014 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| Arthur D. RobinsonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 0.92 |
| Lesley PengSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2011 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 1.55 |
| Robert P. Bell | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.58 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| David E. MorrisonFulbright & Jaworski | Sep 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 1.73 | 0.00 | 2.11 |
| Garrett A. DeVriesAkin Gump | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.77 | 0.00 | 3.04 |
| ROBERT R. KIBBYHaynes and Boone | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Fred A. SummerSquire Sanders (US) | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.53 | 4.25 | 1.98 |
| Stephen I. GloverGibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 31 | 1.56 | 1.39 | 0.61 |
| Dwight A. KinseyDuane Morris | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.59 | 0.00 | 1.26 |