BANK OF NEW YORK CO INC BK (last ticker on record)
CIK 9626Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Dec 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Jan 1999 · Named in a filing · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked Dec 1996 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pepper Hamilton | Jan 1999 | Named in a filing | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | Dec 1996 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Brown & Wood | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ellen MurphyFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 5.79× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.90×
- Mark J. WelshimerSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Herbert J. HuffFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 38 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Jeffrey J. DelaneyPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ellen Murphy | Jun 2004 | Named in a filing | 5 | 5.79 | 0.00 | 1.90 |
| Mark J. WelshimerSullivan & Cromwell | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.98 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Herbert J. Huff | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 38 | 2.00 | 0.00 | 0.50 |
| Jeffrey J. DelaneyPillsbury Winthrop | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 1.56 | 0.00 | 0.00 |