INCOME OPPORTUNITY REALTY INVESTORS INC IOR (last ticker on record)
CIK 949961Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- (formerly Prager, Metzger & Kroemer PLLC)First linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- METZGER & McDONALD PLLCFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Prager, Metzger & Kroemer PLLCFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.56× · Went dark 1.76× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & RenshawFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 1.71× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Andrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Aug 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 398 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (formerly Prager, Metzger & Kroemer PLLC) | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| METZGER & McDONALD PLLC | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.14 |
| Prager, Metzger & Kroemer PLLC | Jul 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.56 | 1.76 | 0.98 |
| Kummer Kaempfer Bonner & Renshaw | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 35 | 0.78 | 1.71 | 1.30 |
| Andrews Kurth LLP | Aug 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 398 | 1.27 | 0.35 | 1.30 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven C. MetzgerMETZGER & McDONALD PLLCFirst linked May 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 1.74× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- DAVID BARBOURAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Dec 1995 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven C. MetzgerMETZGER & McDONALD PLLC | May 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.55 | 1.74 | 0.96 |
| DAVID BARBOURAndrews Kurth LLP | Dec 1995 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.96 |