Attis Industries Inc. ATIS (last ticker on record)
CIK 949721Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began May 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2016 to Jun 2016
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Lucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 223 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 2.05× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Saul EwingFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 100 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.22× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Baratta, Baratta & Aidala LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.76× · Went dark 2.49× · 95% wipeout 3.27×
- Pryor CashmanFirst linked Sep 1999 · Named in a filing · 229 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 1.25× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Baer Marks & UphamFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 1.31× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Greenberg Traurig | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,223 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.10 |
| Lucosky Brookman LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 223 | 1.24 | 2.05 | 1.19 |
| Saul Ewing | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 100 | 1.22 | 1.01 | 1.14 |
| Baratta, Baratta & Aidala LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 2.76 | 2.49 | 3.27 |
| Pryor Cashman | Sep 1999 | Named in a filing | 229 | 1.28 | 1.25 | 1.28 |
| Baer Marks & Upham | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.89 | 1.31 | 1.23 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Anthony J. MarsicoGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Sep 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.38× · Went dark 3.57× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 188 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 1.81× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Lawrence MetelitsaLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 2.87× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Scott E. LinskyLucosky Brookman LLPFirst linked Jun 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.45× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anthony J. MarsicoGreenberg Traurig | Sep 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 33 | 0.38 | 3.57 | 1.29 |
| Joseph M. LucoskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 188 | 1.24 | 1.81 | 1.24 |
| Lawrence MetelitsaLucosky Brookman LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 34 | 0.43 | 2.87 | 1.38 |
| Scott E. LinskyLucosky Brookman LLP | Jun 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 37 | 0.45 | 0.55 | 1.12 |