INVESTORS FINANCIAL SERVICES CORP IFIN (last ticker on record)
CIK 949589Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked May 2007 · Named in a filing · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Bingham McCutchenFirst linked Jan 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 291 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | May 2007 | Named in a filing | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Bingham McCutchen | Jan 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 291 | 0.94 | 0.38 | 1.06 |
| Brown & Wood | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwin L. Miller Jr.Sullivan & Worcester LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.61×
- Steven C. BrowneTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked May 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin L. Miller Jr.Sullivan & Worcester LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 26 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 1.61 |
| Steven C. BrowneTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | May 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |