SPEEDFAM IPEC INC SFAM (last ticker on record)
CIK 949301Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Sep 2001
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Feb 2000 to Oct 2001
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Chapman and CutlerFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.32× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Morrison & Foerster | Nov 2002 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Chapman and Cutler | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 95 | 1.17 | 0.32 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven D. PidgeonDLA PiperFirst linked Jan 2002 · Named in a filing · 42 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Neil WolffWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 4.24×
- Jonathan A. KoffChapman and CutlerFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven D. PidgeonDLA Piper | Jan 2002 | Named in a filing | 42 | 0.90 | 0.90 | 1.08 |
| Neil WolffWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.20 | 0.00 | 4.24 |
| Jonathan A. KoffChapman and Cutler | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.85 |