AVIRON
CIK 949173Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Lillick & Charles LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Warner & Stackpole LLPFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.14× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Cooley LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Davis Polk | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Lillick & Charles LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Warner & Stackpole LLP | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 2.14 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter F. KermanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2001 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2000 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.62×
- Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.60× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- ROBERT J. BRIGHAMCooley LLPFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.74×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter F. KermanLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2001 | Named in a filing | 16 | 2.13 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| Matthew W. SonsiniCooley LLP | Oct 2000 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.27 | 0.00 | 0.62 |
| Alan C. MendelsonLatham & Watkins LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 0.60 | 0.19 | 1.35 |
| ROBERT J. BRIGHAMCooley LLP | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.74 |