TIM S.p.A. TI (last ticker on record)
CIK 948642Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jun 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,696 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jun 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,696 | 1.25 | 0.06 | 0.99 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.01 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.66 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Leo BorchardtDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- John BanesDavis PolkFirst linked Oct 2018 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.45×
- Julia CowlesDavis PolkFirst linked May 2006 · Text search only · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.60×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- John O ConnorSullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.45× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Richard C. MorrisseySullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leo BorchardtDavis Polk | Oct 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 0.64 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| John BanesDavis Polk | Oct 2018 | Text search only | 8 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.45 |
| Julia CowlesDavis Polk | May 2006 | Text search only | 12 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 1.60 |
| John F. Kennedy | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 190 | 1.53 | 0.60 | 1.19 |
| John O ConnorSullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 1.45 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Richard C. MorrisseySullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 14 | 1.29 | 0.00 | 0.75 |