DIEDRICH COFFEE INC DDRX (last ticker on record)
CIK 947661Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Sep 2005 to Dec 2008
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,125 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.20× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,125 | 1.23 | 0.20 | 0.95 |
| Ropes & Gray | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 914 | 0.97 | 0.14 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David C. LeeGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Oct 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- JOHN M. WILLIAMSGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
- Mark W. ShurtleffGibson Dunn & CrutcherFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & GrayFirst linked Dec 2009 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David C. LeeGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Oct 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 1.04 | 0.00 | 1.30 |
| JOHN M. WILLIAMSGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.75 |
| Mark W. ShurtleffGibson Dunn & Crutcher | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Jane D. GoldsteinRopes & Gray | Dec 2009 | Text search only | 22 | 0.41 | 0.00 | 0.51 |