BALTIMORE GAS & ELECTRIC CO
CIK 9466Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Aug 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 12
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Aug 2012 · Named in a filing · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2011 · Named in a filing · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 1.63× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
- Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A.First linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 995 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.46× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Miles & StockbridgeFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 71 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.73× · 95% wipeout 0.46×
- Shaw PittmanFirst linked Mar 2007 · Text search only · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2003 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Feb 2002 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ballard Spahr | Aug 2012 | Named in a filing | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2011 | Named in a filing | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.75 | 1.63 | 1.56 |
| Richards, Layton & Finger, P.A. | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 995 | 1.46 | 0.37 | 0.80 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Miles & Stockbridge | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 71 | 1.19 | 0.73 | 0.46 |
| Shaw Pittman | Mar 2007 | Text search only | 149 | 0.98 | 0.53 | 1.08 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2003 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Brown & Wood | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Feb 2002 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christian O. NaglerKirkland & EllisFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Robert J. Reger Jr.Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLPFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christian O. NaglerKirkland & Ellis | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 260 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Robert J. Reger Jr.Thelen Reid Brown Raysman & Steiner LLP | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 2.14 | 0.00 | 0.00 |