SHERIDAN HEALTHCARE INC SHCR_OLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 946489Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Broad and CasselFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.93×
- Hodgson RussFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 85 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Kutak RockFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Liechty & McGinnisFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.27×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Murtha CullinaFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.89× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Parker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Steptoe & JohnsonFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 80 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.65× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Venable LLPFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 506 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Akerman LLP | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Goodwin Procter | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Broad and Cassel | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 58 | 1.13 | 1.05 | 1.93 |
| Hodgson Russ | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 85 | 1.15 | 0.91 | 1.39 |
| Kutak Rock | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
| Liechty & McGinnis | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 3.27 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Murtha Cullina | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 36 | 1.26 | 0.89 | 1.26 |
| Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 45 | 1.03 | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Steptoe & Johnson | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 80 | 1.10 | 0.65 | 1.34 |
| Venable LLP | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 506 | 0.79 | 0.38 | 0.73 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLPFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.57×
- Peter J. GordonSimpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Apr 1999 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.15× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- KEVIN M. DENNISGoodwin ProcterFirst linked May 1997 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward B. WhittemoreMurtha CullinaFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Emmett W. BerrymanLiechty & McGinnisFirst linked Dec 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.54×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen K. RoddenberryAkerman LLP | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.19 | 0.00 | 0.57 |
| Peter J. GordonSimpson Thacher & Bartlett | Apr 1999 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.68 |
| KEVIN M. DENNISGoodwin Procter | May 1997 | Named in a filing | 7 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward B. WhittemoreMurtha Cullina | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 8 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 1.11 |
| Emmett W. BerrymanLiechty & McGinnis | Dec 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 3.54 |