Z Holdings Group, Inc. ZHLD (last ticker on record)
CIK 946283Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jun 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gersten Savage LLPFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.38× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Willkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 539 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Feldman WeinsteinFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 278 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 1.17× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Cummings & LockwoodFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gersten Savage LLP | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 137 | 1.20 | 1.38 | 1.22 |
| Willkie Farr | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 539 | 1.23 | 0.40 | 0.84 |
| Feldman Weinstein | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 278 | 0.92 | 1.17 | 1.20 |
| Cummings & Lockwood | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.07 | 0.49 | 2.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stephen A. WeissGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 3.24× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Maurice M. LefkortWillkie FarrFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- David N. FeldmanFeldman WeinsteinFirst linked Sep 2003 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- David E. FlemingEpstein Becker & GreenFirst linked May 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.72× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Steven L. SiskindFirst linked Feb 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 1.84× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stephen A. WeissGreenberg Traurig | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.87 | 3.24 | 1.92 |
| Maurice M. LefkortWillkie Farr | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.51 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| David N. FeldmanFeldman Weinstein | Sep 2003 | Named in a filing | 145 | 0.47 | 0.48 | 1.16 |
| David E. FlemingEpstein Becker & Green | May 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 1.72 | 1.24 | 0.82 |
| Steven L. Siskind | Feb 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.32 | 1.84 | 0.67 |