SMURFIT-STONE CONTAINER Corp SSCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 94610Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- King & SpaldingFirst linked Apr 2011 · Named in a filing · 426 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Armstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 64 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.51×
- Winston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 585 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Sidley AustinFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,210 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.93×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| King & Spalding | Apr 2011 | Named in a filing | 426 | 1.28 | 0.35 | 1.04 |
| Armstrong Teasdale | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 64 | 1.00 | 0.00 | 1.51 |
| Winston & Strawn | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 585 | 1.18 | 0.60 | 1.02 |
| Sidley Austin | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,210 | 1.30 | 0.14 | 0.93 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David W. BraswellArmstrong TeasdaleFirst linked Mar 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Joseph A. Walsh Jr.Winston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Steven J. GavinWinston & StrawnFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Kevin F. BlatchfordSidley AustinFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
- RICHARD G. CLEMENSSidley AustinFirst linked Sep 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Frederick C. LowingerSidley AustinFirst linked Jul 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David W. BraswellArmstrong Teasdale | Mar 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Joseph A. Walsh Jr.Winston & Strawn | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.78 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Steven J. GavinWinston & Strawn | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.15 | 0.00 | 1.29 |
| Kevin F. BlatchfordSidley Austin | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 15 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
| RICHARD G. CLEMENSSidley Austin | Sep 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Frederick C. LowingerSidley Austin | Jul 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.91 | 0.00 | 0.00 |