SPORTSLINE COM INC SPLN (last ticker on record)
CIK 945688Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Mar 2004
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Aug 2004 · Named in a filing · 121 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Greenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,224 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Cadwalader Wickersham & TaftFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 305 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.95×
- Dewey BallantineFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 228 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.03× · Went dark 0.29× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 2,650 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hughes Hubbard & Reed | Aug 2004 | Named in a filing | 121 | 1.17 | 0.21 | 1.30 |
| Greenberg Traurig | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,224 | 1.01 | 1.03 | 1.12 |
| Cadwalader Wickersham & Taft | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 305 | 1.14 | 0.24 | 0.95 |
| Dewey Ballantine | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 228 | 2.03 | 0.29 | 0.84 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.84 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 2,650 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.84 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- KENNETH C. HOFFMANGreenberg TraurigFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- John F. KennedyFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 190 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Kenneth A. LefkowitzHughes Hubbard & ReedFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Thomas H. KennedySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Aug 2004 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| KENNETH C. HOFFMANGreenberg Traurig | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.69 | 0.00 | 1.59 |
| John F. Kennedy | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 190 | 1.53 | 0.60 | 1.19 |
| Kenneth A. LefkowitzHughes Hubbard & Reed | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 24 | 0.37 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Thomas H. KennedySkadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Aug 2004 | Text search only | 22 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.39 |