CICERO INC CICN (last ticker on record)
CIK 945384Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Oct 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Jan 2007 to Jun 2017
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.59× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in a filing · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Powell GoldsteinFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Golenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 55 | 0.59 | 1.50 | 1.41 |
| Cooley LLP | Nov 1999 | Named in a filing | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| Powell Goldstein | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 196 | 0.71 | 0.48 | 0.65 |
| Proskauer Rose | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Carl Van DemarkGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Aug 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 1.65× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Lawrence M. BellGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLPFirst linked Apr 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.47× · Went dark 1.57× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
- Katherine M. KoopsPowell GoldsteinFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- Eliot W. RobinsonBryan CaveFirst linked Aug 1999 · Named in a filing · 27 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 0.91× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- EDWARD W. KERSONProskauer RoseFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 4.63× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carl Van DemarkGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Andrew D. HuddersGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Aug 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.70 | 1.65 | 1.32 |
| Lawrence M. BellGolenbock Eiseman Assor Bell & Peskoe LLP | Apr 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.47 | 1.57 | 1.79 |
| Katherine M. KoopsPowell Goldstein | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 41 | 0.61 | 0.41 | 1.34 |
| Eliot W. RobinsonBryan Cave | Aug 1999 | Named in a filing | 27 | 0.40 | 0.91 | 0.29 |
| EDWARD W. KERSONProskauer Rose | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 1.24 | 4.63 | 1.18 |