GLOBAL INDUSTRIAL Co GIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 945114Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Herbert SmithFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 90 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Kramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 304 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.68× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Stroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 178 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Herbert Smith | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 90 | 1.01 | 0.00 | 0.65 |
| Kramer Levin Naftalis | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 304 | 0.95 | 0.68 | 1.16 |
| Stroock & Stroock & Lavan | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 178 | 0.98 | 0.78 | 0.96 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin NaftalisFirst linked Jun 2026 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & LavanFirst linked Aug 2018 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ari EdelmanReed SmithFirst linked Oct 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jordan M. RosenbaumKramer Levin Naftalis | Jun 2026 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Todd E. LensonStroock & Stroock & Lavan | Aug 2018 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ari EdelmanReed Smith | Oct 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 53 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.49 |