TARRANT APPAREL GROUP TAGS (last ticker on record)
CIK 944948Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Aug 2006 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Thompson & KnightFirst linked Oct 2003 · Text search only · 198 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.40× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 45 | 1.40 | 0.86 | 0.94 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Aug 2006 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Thompson & Knight | Oct 2003 | Text search only | 198 | 1.03 | 0.40 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Jun 2003 · Named in SEC correspondence · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Peter M. MenardSheppard MullinFirst linked Nov 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Ryan AzleinStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.23× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. McIlveryStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Jun 2003 | Named in SEC correspondence | 23 | 0.85 | 0.55 | 0.51 |
| Peter M. MenardSheppard Mullin | Nov 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 1.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Ryan AzleinStubbs Alderton & Markiles, LLP | Sep 2006 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 2.23 | 1.16 |