TRANSWITCH CORP /DE TXCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 944739Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Nov 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pierce AtwoodFirst linked Feb 2012 · Named in SEC correspondence · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.23×
- Brown RudnickFirst linked Jun 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 137 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.90× · 95% wipeout 0.97×
- Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 150 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.42× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Goulston & StorrsFirst linked Mar 2001 · Text search only · 86 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pierce Atwood | Feb 2012 | Named in SEC correspondence | 32 | 1.23 | 0.00 | 0.23 |
| Brown Rudnick | Jun 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 137 | 0.84 | 0.90 | 0.97 |
| Testa, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 150 | 1.08 | 0.42 | 1.31 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Bingham Dana | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Goulston & Storrs | Mar 2001 | Text search only | 86 | 0.90 | 0.34 | 1.33 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Abigail ArmsShearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2003 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Timothy C. MaguireTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked Nov 1997 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.27× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- Steven C. BrowneTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLPFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Stephen H. FabermanBingham DanaFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Abigail ArmsShearman & Sterling | May 2003 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.24 | 0.00 | 1.17 |
| Timothy C. MaguireTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | Nov 1997 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 2.27 | 0.00 | 0.80 |
| Steven C. BrowneTesta, Hurwitz & Thibeault, LLP | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Stephen H. FabermanBingham Dana | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |