VION PHARMACEUTICALS INC VION (last ticker on record)
CIK 944522Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 2004 to Jan 2010
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Wiggin and DanaFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 56 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.37×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Jun 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Wiggin and Dana | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 56 | 0.82 | 0.30 | 1.37 |
| DLA Piper | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Merrill M. KrainesFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.16× · Went dark 0.94× · 95% wipeout 1.47×
- Michael GrundeiWiggin and DanaFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.34×
- PAUL JACOBSFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 2.22×
- Jonathan KleinDLA PiperFirst linked Jun 2007 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Merrill M. KrainesFulbright & Jaworski | Dec 2008 | Named in a filing | 15 | 2.16 | 0.94 | 1.47 |
| Michael GrundeiWiggin and Dana | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 1.34 |
| PAUL JACOBSFulbright & Jaworski | Jun 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.14 | 1.06 | 2.22 |
| Jonathan KleinDLA Piper | Jun 2007 | Text search only | 13 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.12 |