Remote Dynamics Inc RDYM (last ticker on record)
CIK 944400Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2008
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Feb 2000 to May 2004
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Richardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 215 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 1.41× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Locke Liddell & Sapp LLPFirst linked Oct 2001 · Named in a filing · 106 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Baker Botts L.L.P.First linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 495 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.32× · Went dark 0.09× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Brown & WoodFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 299 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 0.47× · 95% wipeout 0.58×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 215 | 1.07 | 1.41 | 1.28 |
| Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP | Oct 2001 | Named in a filing | 106 | 1.24 | 0.72 | 1.73 |
| Baker Botts L.L.P. | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 495 | 1.32 | 0.09 | 1.03 |
| Brown & Wood | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 299 | 1.53 | 0.47 | 0.58 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLPFirst linked Sep 2006 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Geoffrey L. NewtonBaker Botts L.L.P.First linked Oct 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jody R. SamuelsRichardson & Patel LLP | Sep 2006 | Named in a filing | 13 | 2.09 | 1.37 | 1.07 |
| Geoffrey L. NewtonBaker Botts L.L.P. | Oct 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 3.04 | 0.00 | 0.96 |