RESMED INC RMD (last ticker on record)
CIK 943819Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jan 2020
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Oct 1999 · Named in a filing · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baker & McKenzie | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 0.96 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Oct 1999 | Named in a filing | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.08 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Roger W. BivansBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 2020 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.44× · 95% wipeout 1.52×
- Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Jan 2007 · Named in a filing · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.58× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 0.60×
- David B. AllenK&L GatesFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.47× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Patrick SeaverLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.59× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roger W. BivansBaker & McKenzie | Aug 2020 | Named in a filing | 18 | 0.65 | 1.44 | 1.52 |
| Regina M. SchlatterLatham & Watkins LLP | Jan 2007 | Named in a filing | 18 | 1.58 | 1.12 | 0.60 |
| David B. AllenK&L Gates | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.47 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Patrick SeaverLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.59 | 0.00 | 0.00 |