TN-K ENERGY GROUP INC. TNKY (last ticker on record)
CIK 942650Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Restructuring
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Apr 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Apr 1999 to Dec 2000
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Haynes and BooneFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 353 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 0.84×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jun 2000 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Hughes & LuceFirst linked Apr 2004 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.58× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Haynes and Boone | Apr 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 353 | 1.03 | 0.56 | 0.84 |
| Akin Gump | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | Jun 2000 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Hughes & Luce | Apr 2004 | Text search only | 58 | 1.25 | 0.58 | 2.09 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul A. BelvinAkin GumpFirst linked Apr 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.80× · 95% wipeout 3.16×
- J. Jay HerronO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.56× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Michael L. HawkinsO Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 2.00× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- John R. HempillMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Nov 2004 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.53× · Went dark 2.63× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul A. BelvinAkin Gump | Apr 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.19 | 1.80 | 3.16 |
| J. Jay HerronO Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 21 | 1.56 | 1.04 | 1.76 |
| Michael L. HawkinsO Melveny & Myers LLP | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.99 | 2.00 | 1.72 |
| John R. HempillMorrison & Foerster | Nov 2004 | Text search only | 7 | 1.53 | 2.63 | 1.12 |