UNS Energy Corp UNS (last ticker on record)
CIK 941138Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Nov 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Thelen LLPFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.33× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Thelen Reid & PriestFirst linked Aug 1998 · Named in a filing · 124 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 1.16× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- O Melveny & Myers LLPFirst linked May 1998 · Named in a filing · 589 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.25× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Reid & Priest LLPFirst linked Mar 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snell & Wilmer | Jun 2011 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
| Morgan Lewis | Nov 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Thelen LLP | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 22 | 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.31 |
| Thelen Reid & Priest | Aug 1998 | Named in a filing | 124 | 0.98 | 1.16 | 1.20 |
| O Melveny & Myers LLP | May 1998 | Named in a filing | 589 | 1.07 | 0.25 | 1.07 |
| Reid & Priest LLP | Mar 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Holland & Knight | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John T. HoodMorgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey BallantineFirst linked Feb 2003 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John T. HoodMorgan Lewis | Sep 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey Ballantine | Feb 2003 | Text search only | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |