PYXUS INTERNATIONAL, INC. PYYX (last ticker on record)
CIK 939930Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Bankruptcy
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 5
- Newest began Oct 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- Oct 2012 to Sep 2015
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative proceedingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions an SEC subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- SEC enforcement releaseSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the SECForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLPFirst linked Jan 2005 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Aug 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 58 | 1.13 | 0.57 | 1.27 |
| Hunton & Williams | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Sep 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Womble Carlyle Sandridge & Rice, LLP | Jan 2005 | Text search only | 110 | 1.07 | 0.53 | 1.03 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- STEPHEN M. LYNCHROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSONFirst linked Sep 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- RANDALL S. PARKSHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.39× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| STEPHEN M. LYNCHROBINSON BRADSHAW & HINSON | Sep 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.03 |
| RANDALL S. PARKSHunton & Williams | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 2.00 |