DATASTREAM SYSTEMS INC DSTM (last ticker on record)
CIK 938481Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Feb 2005
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Alston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 583 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.99× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alston & Bird | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 583 | 0.99 | 0.39 | 0.79 |
| Hunton & Williams | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven L. PottleAlston & BirdFirst linked Aug 2000 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- B. LYNN WALSHHunton & WilliamsFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- J. Stephen HuffordHunton & WilliamsFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven L. PottleAlston & Bird | Aug 2000 | Named in a filing | 14 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 0.66 |
| B. LYNN WALSHHunton & Williams | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| J. Stephen HuffordHunton & Williams | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.70 | 0.00 | 0.00 |