FOODBRANDS AMERICA INC
CIK 938348Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
- Shook Hardy & BaconFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.76×
- Brunini Grantham Grower & HewesFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Nexsen PruetFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.39×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jul 2009 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Kutak RockFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 123 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 1.56× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 63 | 1.24 | 0.44 | 1.29 |
| Shook Hardy & Bacon | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.07 | 0.00 | 1.76 |
| Brunini Grantham Grower & Hewes | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 15 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Nexsen Pruet | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 24 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.39 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jul 2009 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Kutak Rock | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 123 | 0.93 | 1.56 | 0.64 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- W. Chris ColemanMcAfee & Taft A Professional CorporationFirst linked Apr 1997 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.94×
- Kevin R. SweeneyShook Hardy & BaconFirst linked Feb 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel L. HeardKutak RockFirst linked Jun 2009 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.61× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| W. Chris ColemanMcAfee & Taft A Professional Corporation | Apr 1997 | Named in a filing | 6 | 1.31 | 0.00 | 1.94 |
| Kevin R. SweeneyShook Hardy & Bacon | Feb 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel L. HeardKutak Rock | Jun 2009 | Text search only | 13 | 0.61 | 0.00 | 0.90 |