RAVENSWOOD WINERY INC RVWD (last ticker on record)
CIK 937015Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Farella Braun & MartelFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.40× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLPFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Nixon PeabodyFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 196 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.78× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Phillips LytleFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.71×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Farella Braun & Martel | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 23 | 0.40 | 1.33 | 1.07 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Kurzman Eisenberg Corbin & Lever, LLP | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.89 |
| McDermott Will & Emery | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Nixon Peabody | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 196 | 1.13 | 0.78 | 0.90 |
| Phillips Lytle | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 22 | 0.28 | 0.00 | 0.71 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- MARIA L. PIZZOLIFarella Braun & MartelFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Mark P. TanouryCooley LLPFirst linked Feb 1999 · Named in a filing · 36 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Sep 2001 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.09×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MARIA L. PIZZOLIFarella Braun & Martel | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Mark P. TanouryCooley LLP | Feb 1999 | Named in a filing | 36 | 0.42 | 0.54 | 1.20 |
| Bernard S. KramerMcDermott Will & Emery | Sep 2001 | Text search only | 8 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 2.09 |