Shire plc SHPGY (last ticker on record)
CIK 936402Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Feb 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 16
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a formal order of investigationForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Feb 2019 · Named in a filing · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Davis PolkFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Kaye ScholerFirst linked Dec 2003 · Named in a filing · 161 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.88× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Slaughter and MayFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 35 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Cahill Gordon & ReindelFirst linked Nov 1999 · Named in SEC correspondence · 598 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Mourant Ozannes (Cayman)First linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- R. Scott FalkFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.41×
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Stikeman ElliottFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 225 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Feb 2019 | Named in a filing | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| Ropes & Gray | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| Davis Polk | Feb 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Kaye Scholer | Dec 2003 | Named in a filing | 161 | 0.88 | 1.03 | 1.00 |
| Slaughter and May | Nov 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 35 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 1.22 |
| Cahill Gordon & Reindel | Nov 1999 | Named in SEC correspondence | 598 | 1.03 | 0.18 | 0.77 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Mayer Brown | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Mourant Ozannes (Cayman) | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 54 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| R. Scott Falk | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 21 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 0.41 |
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Maples and Calder | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
| Stikeman Elliott | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 225 | 1.08 | 0.11 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Christopher D. ComeauRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 21 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- Daniel E. WolfKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 44 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.30×
- Michael P. BrueckKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.46× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Paul KinsellaRopes & GrayFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.70× · Went dark 0.39× · 95% wipeout 0.66×
- R. Scott FalkKirkland & EllisFirst linked Feb 2016 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.44×
- William J. ChuddDavis PolkFirst linked Jan 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Andrew ZuckermanLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLPFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.81×
- John B. MeadeDavis PolkFirst linked Feb 2007 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Barbara NimsDavis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- John J. McCarthy Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Paul T. ShultzFirst linked Nov 2005 · Named in a filing · 136 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 1.49×
- Paul T. SchultzFirst linked Jun 2002 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
- Zachary BlumeRopes & GrayFirst linked Mar 2016 · Text search only · 31 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 1.69× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.29×
- David A. SchuetteMayer BrownFirst linked Feb 2016 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Raymond Chabot Grant ThorntonFirst linked Jan 2001 · Text search only · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Christopher D. ComeauRopes & Gray | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 21 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| Daniel E. WolfKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 44 | 1.18 | 0.00 | 0.30 |
| Michael P. BrueckKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 2.46 | 0.00 | 1.26 |
| Paul KinsellaRopes & Gray | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 1.70 | 0.39 | 0.66 |
| R. Scott FalkKirkland & Ellis | Feb 2016 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.44 |
| William J. ChuddDavis Polk | Jan 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Andrew ZuckermanLewis Brisbois Bisgaard & Smith LLP | Jul 2011 | Named in a filing | 19 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.81 |
| John B. MeadeDavis Polk | Feb 2007 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 0.83 |
| Barbara NimsDavis Polk | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 12 | 1.64 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| John J. McCarthy Jr.Davis Polk | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Paul T. Shultz | Nov 2005 | Named in a filing | 136 | 1.34 | 0.18 | 1.49 |
| Paul T. Schultz | Jun 2002 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.49 | 0.00 | 1.41 |
| Zachary BlumeRopes & Gray | Mar 2016 | Text search only | 31 | 1.30 | 1.69 | 0.52 |
| Charles W. Mulaney Jr.Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 34 | 1.08 | 0.00 | 0.29 |
| David A. SchuetteMayer Brown | Feb 2016 | Text search only | 23 | 1.55 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Raymond Chabot Grant Thornton | Jan 2001 | Text search only | 13 | 1.35 | 0.00 | 0.00 |