LINC CAPITAL INC LNCC (last ticker on record)
CIK 936094Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Apr 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 98%
- May 1998 to May 2000
- Law firms
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Kirkland & Ellis | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,688 | 0.97 | 0.17 | 0.86 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jeffrey S. O'ConnorKirkland & EllisFirst linked Jul 1999 · Named in a filing · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.32×
- Carter W. EmersonKirkland & EllisFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.47×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey S. O'ConnorKirkland & Ellis | Jul 1999 | Named in a filing | 7 | 1.17 | 0.00 | 1.32 |
| Carter W. EmersonKirkland & Ellis | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.77 | 0.00 | 3.47 |