DOLLAR TREE, INC. DLTR (last ticker on record)
CIK 935703Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2022
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 10
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
- Wachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 889 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.07× · 95% wipeout 0.59×
- Parker Poe Adams & BernsteinFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 45 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.53× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2016 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Sep 2014 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Williams MullenFirst linked Jun 2010 · Text search only · 113 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.76 |
| Wachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 889 | 1.31 | 0.07 | 0.59 |
| Parker Poe Adams & Bernstein | May 2016 | Text search only | 45 | 1.03 | 0.53 | 0.87 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2016 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Sep 2014 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Williams Mullen | Jun 2010 | Text search only | 113 | 0.92 | 0.00 | 0.67 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lee G. LesterLeClairRyan A Professional CorporationFirst linked Jul 2025 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Robert E. Spicer Jr.Williams MullenFirst linked Mar 2022 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.08×
- Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Nov 2021 · Named in a filing · 26 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.80× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Paul M. TigerFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Sep 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.77× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 75 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.42× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
- Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.13× · Went dark 0.84× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & KatzFirst linked Aug 2014 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis PolkFirst linked May 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 149 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.91× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Phillip B. KennedyGaeta & Eveson, P.A.First linked May 2016 · Text search only · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 4.41× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.86×
- Brian L. SchorrPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Aug 2014 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.94× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee G. LesterLeClairRyan A Professional Corporation | Jul 2025 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Robert E. Spicer Jr.Williams Mullen | Mar 2022 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 2.08 |
| Kathryn Gettles-AtwaWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Nov 2021 | Named in a filing | 26 | 1.80 | 0.00 | 0.78 |
| Paul M. TigerFreshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Sep 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 3.77 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Daniel A. NeffWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 75 | 1.42 | 0.00 | 0.82 |
| Ethan A. KlingsbergCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Aug 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 30 | 2.13 | 0.84 | 1.33 |
| Trevor S. NorwitzWachtell Lipton Rosen & Katz | Aug 2014 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.85 | 0.00 | 1.44 |
| Richard D. Truesdell Jr.Davis Polk | May 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 149 | 0.91 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
| Phillip B. KennedyGaeta & Eveson, P.A. | May 2016 | Text search only | 5 | 4.41 | 0.00 | 1.86 |
| Brian L. SchorrPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Aug 2014 | Text search only | 7 | 0.94 | 0.00 | 0.00 |