SCOLR Pharma, Inc. SCLR (last ticker on record)
CIK 934936Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- DLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2004 · Named in a filing · 1,184 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARERFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 33 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- Piper RudnickFirst linked Mar 2005 · Text search only · 183 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DLA Piper | Mar 2004 | Named in a filing | 1,184 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.20 |
| GARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARER | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 33 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| Piper Rudnick | Mar 2005 | Text search only | 183 | 1.09 | 0.37 | 0.82 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Peter B. CancelmoGARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARERFirst linked May 2010 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- W. Michael HutchingsDLA PiperFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in a filing · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.59× · Went dark 0.96× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Bruce A. RobertsonGARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARERFirst linked May 1999 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.11×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Peter B. CancelmoGARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARER | May 2010 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.89 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| W. Michael HutchingsDLA Piper | Mar 2005 | Named in a filing | 15 | 1.59 | 0.96 | 0.00 |
| Bruce A. RobertsonGARVEY, SCHUBERT & BARER | May 1999 | Named in a filing | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 2.11 |