STANDARD REGISTER CO SRCT (last ticker on record)
CIK 93456Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Apr 1998 to Dec 2015
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| KEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.56 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles F. Hertlein Jr.Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked May 2013 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
- Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMPFirst linked Apr 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.50× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.67×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles F. Hertlein Jr.Dinsmore & Shohl | May 2013 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.88 |
| Gary P. KreiderKEATING, MUETHING & KLEKAMP | Apr 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 0.50 | 0.00 | 0.67 |