SPS TECHNOLOGIES INC ST (last ticker on record)
CIK 93444Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 9
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jan 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Baker & HostetlerFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 231 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.11× · Went dark 1.12× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Davis Graham & StubbsFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 142 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.97× · 95% wipeout 1.46×
- Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLPFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Montgomery McCracken Walker & RhoadsFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.32×
- Moore & Van AllenFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 131 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Warner Norcross & JuddFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 60 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Goodwin Procter | Jan 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Baker & Hostetler | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 231 | 1.11 | 1.12 | 1.35 |
| Davis Graham & Stubbs | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 142 | 0.97 | 0.97 | 1.46 |
| Mirick, O'Connell, DeMallie & Lougee, LLP | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Montgomery McCracken Walker & Rhoads | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 23 | 0.74 | 0.00 | 0.32 |
| Moore & Van Allen | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 131 | 0.66 | 0.17 | 0.90 |
| Quarles & Brady | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Stoel Rives | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Warner Norcross & Judd | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 60 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 1.06 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Reed W. TophamStoel RivesFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.52×
- Ruth A. BeyerStoel RivesFirst linked Mar 2004 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reed W. TophamStoel Rives | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 14 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 0.52 |
| Ruth A. BeyerStoel Rives | Mar 2004 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.79 |