ENGLOBAL CORP ENG (last ticker on record)
CIK 933738Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Bankruptcy
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Aug 2008 to Mar 2025
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Bankruptcy or receivership (Item 1.03)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Holland & HartFirst linked Aug 2009 · Named in a filing · 240 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.82× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.86×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Hale Lane Peek Dennison and HowardFirst linked Dec 2005 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.68×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Aug 2001 · Named in SEC correspondence · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Duane MorrisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 1.28× · 95% wipeout 1.06×
- Sherman & Howard L.L.C.First linked Dec 2005 · Text search only · 105 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.99× · 95% wipeout 1.48×
- Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Porter & Hedges | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Holland & Hart | Aug 2009 | Named in a filing | 240 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 0.86 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Hale Lane Peek Dennison and Howard | Dec 2005 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.64 | 0.62 | 1.68 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Aug 2001 | Named in SEC correspondence | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Duane Morris | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 413 | 0.76 | 1.28 | 1.06 |
| Sherman & Howard L.L.C. | Dec 2005 | Text search only | 105 | 1.02 | 0.99 | 1.48 |
| Barack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 104 | 0.49 | 0.18 | 0.75 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- E. James CowenPorter & HedgesFirst linked Jan 2014 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Feb 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 61 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.74×
- Adam K. NalleyPorter & HedgesFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Dean M. ColucciDuane MorrisFirst linked Jan 2021 · Text search only · 49 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- John E. FreechackBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Text search only · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.22× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.75×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| E. James CowenPorter & Hedges | Jan 2014 | Named in a filing | 13 | 1.44 | 0.00 | 1.18 |
| John J. HuberLatham & Watkins LLP | Feb 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 61 | 1.12 | 0.00 | 1.74 |
| Adam K. NalleyPorter & Hedges | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Dean M. ColucciDuane Morris | Jan 2021 | Text search only | 49 | 0.36 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| John E. FreechackBarack Ferrazzano Kirschbaum & Nagelberg LLP | Oct 2005 | Text search only | 30 | 0.22 | 0.00 | 0.75 |