Spy Inc. XSPY (last ticker on record)
CIK 932372Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Aug 2012
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Disclosure Law GroupFirst linked Nov 2013 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.42× · Went dark 0.88× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 2007 · Named in a filing · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Disclosure Law Group | Nov 2013 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.42 | 0.88 | 1.08 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Aug 2007 | Named in a filing | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- John J. HentrichSheppard MullinFirst linked Aug 2011 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.09× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 2.39×
- Ivan A. GaviriaGunderson DettmerFirst linked Dec 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Christopher M. ForresterShearman & SterlingFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.33×
- Mike HirdPillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2004 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.82×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| John J. HentrichSheppard Mullin | Aug 2011 | Named in a filing | 16 | 2.09 | 0.80 | 2.39 |
| Ivan A. GaviriaGunderson Dettmer | Dec 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 7 | 1.09 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Christopher M. ForresterShearman & Sterling | Sep 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.26 | 0.00 | 1.33 |
| Mike HirdPillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2004 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.82 |