CENTERSPAN COMMUNICATIONS CORP
CIK 932290Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Jones DayFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Miller Nash LLPFirst linked Feb 2001 · Named in a filing · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.43× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jones Day | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Miller Nash LLP | Feb 2001 | Named in a filing | 41 | 0.43 | 0.00 | 0.90 |
| Perkins Coie | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Stoel Rives | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Danielle BenderlyPerkins CoieFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.65× · Went dark 1.26× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Patrick J. SimpsonPerkins CoieFirst linked Mar 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.27× · Went dark 1.86× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- David MathesonPerkins CoieFirst linked Jun 1998 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- John J. HalleStoel RivesFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.45×
- STEPHEN E. BABSONStoel RivesFirst linked Aug 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.53×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Danielle BenderlyPerkins Coie | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 30 | 1.65 | 1.26 | 0.91 |
| Patrick J. SimpsonPerkins Coie | Mar 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 1.27 | 1.86 | 1.23 |
| David MathesonPerkins Coie | Jun 1998 | Named in a filing | 14 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| John J. HalleStoel Rives | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 11 | 0.67 | 0.00 | 2.45 |
| STEPHEN E. BABSONStoel Rives | Aug 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.53 |