Sustainable Environmental Technologies Corp SETS (last ticker on record)
CIK 932136Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2011
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Stoel RivesFirst linked Apr 2009 · Named in a filing · 208 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Ballard SpahrFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.23× · Went dark 1.06× · 95% wipeout 0.73×
- Oswald & YapFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.66× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stoel Rives | Apr 2009 | Named in a filing | 208 | 0.84 | 0.67 | 1.20 |
| Ballard Spahr | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 492 | 1.23 | 1.06 | 0.73 |
| Oswald & Yap | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 25 | 1.48 | 1.66 | 1.15 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Scott D. OlsonStoel RivesFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.61× · 95% wipeout 1.72×
- Scott OlsonAndrews Kurth LLPFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
- Gerald J. GuarciniBallard SpahrFirst linked Jul 2006 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.48× · Went dark 1.67× · 95% wipeout 0.40×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott D. OlsonStoel Rives | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 24 | 1.02 | 1.61 | 1.72 |
| Scott OlsonAndrews Kurth LLP | Jul 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 1.65 |
| Gerald J. GuarciniBallard Spahr | Jul 2006 | Text search only | 69 | 1.48 | 1.67 | 0.40 |