MICREL INC MCRL (last ticker on record)
CIK 932111Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Nov 2002 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Morrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 825 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Jul 2015 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Nov 2002 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Morrison & Foerster | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 825 | 1.17 | 0.55 | 1.15 |
| Seward & Kissel | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Bingham Dana | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. TorosianDLA PiperFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.36× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Aug 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.20× · Went dark 1.24× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & FoersterFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.49× · Went dark 0.92× · 95% wipeout 0.50×
- Stephen J. SchraderBaker & McKenzieFirst linked Aug 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Edward S. HortonSeward & KisselFirst linked Jun 2008 · Text search only · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.01×
- Michael J. DanaherWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 1.51× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. TorosianDLA Piper | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.36 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Patrick A. PohlenLatham & Watkins LLP | Aug 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 43 | 1.20 | 1.24 | 1.03 |
| Michael C. PhillipsMorrison & Foerster | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 16 | 0.49 | 0.92 | 0.50 |
| Stephen J. SchraderBaker & McKenzie | Aug 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 15 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Edward S. HortonSeward & Kissel | Jun 2008 | Text search only | 39 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 2.01 |
| Michael J. DanaherWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 37 | 1.02 | 1.51 | 1.62 |