LITTLEFIELD CORP LTFD (last ticker on record)
CIK 931683Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Jul 2006
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Strasburger & PriceFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.87× · Went dark 1.01× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- Jenkens & GilchristFirst linked Mar 2002 · Named in a filing · 279 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.71× · 95% wipeout 1.11×
- Silverman, Collura, Chernis & Balzano, P.C.First linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 3.15× · 95% wipeout 1.98×
- Silverman, Collura & Chernis, P.C.First linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.18× · Went dark 1.91× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strasburger & Price | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 39 | 0.87 | 1.01 | 1.23 |
| Jenkens & Gilchrist | Mar 2002 | Named in a filing | 279 | 1.12 | 0.71 | 1.11 |
| Silverman, Collura, Chernis & Balzano, P.C. | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 8 | 2.05 | 3.15 | 1.98 |
| Silverman, Collura & Chernis, P.C. | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 19 | 2.18 | 1.91 | 1.44 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Lee PolsonStrasburger & PriceFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 1.50× · 95% wipeout 1.03×
- Michael H. FreedmanSilverman, Collura, Chernis & Balzano, P.C.First linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 2.10× · 95% wipeout 1.55×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lee PolsonStrasburger & Price | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 13 | 0.68 | 1.50 | 1.03 |
| Michael H. FreedmanSilverman, Collura, Chernis & Balzano, P.C. | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 11 | 1.49 | 2.10 | 1.55 |