Rennova Health, Inc. RNVA (last ticker on record)
CIK 931059Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2017
- Largest fall in its shares
- 99%
- Dec 2016 to Oct 2017
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Shutts & BowenFirst linked Apr 2017 · Named in SEC correspondence · 39 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.65× · Went dark 1.09× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Akerman LLPFirst linked Jul 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 211 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Goodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,221 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.79× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Law Offices of Gary L. BlumFirst linked Feb 2021 · Text search only · 34 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.78× · Went dark 2.90× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Reed SmithFirst linked Dec 2013 · Text search only · 487 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Simpson Thacher & BartlettFirst linked Jul 2005 · Text search only · 1,396 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.11× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Clifford Chance US LLPFirst linked Jun 2004 · Text search only · 260 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.92× · Went dark 0.41× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shutts & Bowen | Apr 2017 | Named in SEC correspondence | 39 | 0.65 | 1.09 | 0.77 |
| Akerman LLP | Jul 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 211 | 1.09 | 0.67 | 1.36 |
| Goodwin Procter | Jul 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,221 | 0.79 | 0.31 | 1.17 |
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Law Offices of Gary L. Blum | Feb 2021 | Text search only | 34 | 1.78 | 2.90 | 1.12 |
| Reed Smith | Dec 2013 | Text search only | 487 | 1.15 | 0.77 | 1.13 |
| Simpson Thacher & Bartlett | Jul 2005 | Text search only | 1,396 | 1.28 | 0.11 | 0.92 |
| Clifford Chance US LLP | Jun 2004 | Text search only | 260 | 0.92 | 0.41 | 0.85 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. Thomas CooksonShutts & BowenFirst linked Nov 2015 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 2.30× · 95% wipeout 0.54×
- Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLPFirst linked Nov 2014 · Named in a filing · 267 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.46× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLPFirst linked Oct 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.67× · Went dark 1.05× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- William DavissonGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.69× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.80×
- Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Joseph E. NidaSheppard MullinFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.29×
- James KardonHahn & HessenFirst linked Jul 2003 · Text search only · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 3.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Thomas CooksonShutts & Bowen | Nov 2015 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 0.00 | 2.30 | 0.54 |
| Gregory SichenziaSichenzia Ross Ference LLP | Nov 2014 | Named in a filing | 267 | 1.06 | 1.46 | 1.24 |
| Robert W. PhillipsCooley LLP | Oct 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 0.67 | 1.05 | 1.02 |
| William DavissonGoodwin Procter | Aug 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 10 | 0.69 | 0.00 | 1.80 |
| Christopher L. KaufmanLatham & Watkins LLP | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 54 | 0.81 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Joseph E. NidaSheppard Mullin | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 9 | 0.76 | 0.00 | 2.29 |
| James KardonHahn & Hessen | Jul 2003 | Text search only | 11 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 3.28 |