Polaris Inc. PII (last ticker on record)
CIK 931015Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began May 2010
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Nov 2023 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked May 2020 · Named in a filing · 138 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 4.29× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre Baker DanielsFirst linked Oct 2015 · Named in a filing · 145 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
- Faegre & BensonFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.90× · Went dark 0.59× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- Kaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked Oct 1994 · Named in SEC correspondence · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Nov 2023 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | May 2020 | Named in a filing | 138 | 1.29 | 4.29 | 1.16 |
| Faegre Baker Daniels | Oct 2015 | Named in a filing | 145 | 1.06 | 0.34 | 1.16 |
| Faegre & Benson | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 160 | 0.90 | 0.59 | 1.08 |
| Kaplan Strangis and Kaplan | Oct 1994 | Named in SEC correspondence | 24 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Amy C. SeidelFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLPFirst linked May 2011 · Named in a filing · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.75× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Catherine A. BartlettKaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- James C. MelvilleKaplan Strangis and KaplanFirst linked Jan 1995 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Amy C. SeidelFaegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP | May 2011 | Named in a filing | 22 | 0.75 | 0.00 | 0.85 |
| Catherine A. BartlettKaplan Strangis and Kaplan | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| James C. MelvilleKaplan Strangis and Kaplan | Jan 1995 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |