ISTA PHARMACEUTICALS INC ISTA (last ticker on record)
CIK 930553Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2013
- Largest fall in its shares
- 97%
- Apr 2004 to Nov 2008
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- A Justice Department statement names it, an officer or its stockJustice Department (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 741 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.12× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- Stradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Feb 2003 · Named in a filing · 165 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 1.37× · 95% wipeout 1.30×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 741 | 1.31 | 0.12 | 0.72 |
| Stradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Feb 2003 | Named in a filing | 165 | 1.18 | 1.37 | 1.30 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Glenn P. McGroryCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.86× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.61×
- Robert P. DavisCleary Gottlieb Steen & HamiltonFirst linked Jun 2012 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.49×
- C. Craig CarlsonStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked May 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 13 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.94× · Went dark 1.72× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Lawrence B. CohnStradling Yocca Carlson & RauthFirst linked Jan 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.01× · Went dark 1.04× · 95% wipeout 1.59×
- Michael A. HedgeK&L GatesFirst linked Jul 2006 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.77× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn P. McGroryCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 12 | 3.86 | 0.00 | 0.61 |
| Robert P. DavisCleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton | Jun 2012 | Named in a filing | 16 | 3.67 | 0.00 | 0.49 |
| C. Craig CarlsonStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | May 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 13 | 1.94 | 1.72 | 0.79 |
| Lawrence B. CohnStradling Yocca Carlson & Rauth | Jan 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 14 | 1.01 | 1.04 | 1.59 |
| Michael A. HedgeK&L Gates | Jul 2006 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.98 | 0.77 | 1.89 |