DELHAIZE GROUP DEG (last ticker on record)
CIK 930309Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 1
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLPFirst linked Jul 2012 · Named in a filing · 127 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.28× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Hunton & WilliamsFirst linked Nov 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 404 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 0.65×
- Akin GumpFirst linked Apr 2001 · Named in a filing · 582 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.24× · Went dark 0.52× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
- Linklaters LLPFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 156 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.63×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Verrill DanaFirst linked Jan 2011 · Text search only · 24 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer US LLP | Jul 2012 | Named in a filing | 127 | 1.28 | 0.00 | 0.91 |
| Hunton & Williams | Nov 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 404 | 1.06 | 0.36 | 0.65 |
| Akin Gump | Apr 2001 | Named in a filing | 582 | 1.24 | 0.52 | 1.25 |
| Linklaters LLP | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 156 | 1.05 | 0.00 | 0.63 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Verrill Dana | Jan 2011 | Text search only | 24 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. Steven PattersonHunton Andrews Kurth LLP | May 2002 | Named in a filing | 12 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.52 |