ASPENTECH Corp AZPN (last ticker on record)
CIK 929940Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restatement
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Sep 2019
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 13
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- An SEC release names it, an officer or its stockSEC release (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a Wells noticeForm 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- K&L GatesFirst linked Mar 2013 · Named in SEC correspondence · 723 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Cooley LLPFirst linked Apr 2010 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,634 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.71× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 1.24×
- WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERINGFirst linked Jun 2001 · Named in a filing · 662 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- HALE AND DORRFirst linked Jul 2000 · Named in a filing · 665 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.06× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 1.26×
- Bingham DanaFirst linked Sep 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 104 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.37× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Foley HoagFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 186 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.95× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Pepper HamiltonFirst linked Sep 2010 · Text search only · 340 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.13×
- Cravath Swaine & MooreFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 839 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.03× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Hinckley Allen & SnyderFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 62 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.41× · Went dark 0.38× · 95% wipeout 0.51×
- Ropes & GrayFirst linked Apr 2007 · Text search only · 914 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.14× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- McAlister & HilbertFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- Porter & HedgesFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 108 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.36× · 95% wipeout 1.44×
- Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein McAlister & HilbertFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K&L Gates | Mar 2013 | Named in SEC correspondence | 723 | 1.06 | 1.35 | 1.18 |
| Cooley LLP | Apr 2010 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,634 | 0.71 | 0.44 | 1.24 |
| WILMER, CUTLER & PICKERING | Jun 2001 | Named in a filing | 662 | 1.14 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| HALE AND DORR | Jul 2000 | Named in a filing | 665 | 1.06 | 0.33 | 1.26 |
| Bingham Dana | Sep 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 104 | 1.37 | 0.54 | 1.14 |
| Foley Hoag | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 186 | 0.72 | 0.95 | 1.17 |
| Pepper Hamilton | Sep 2010 | Text search only | 340 | 1.03 | 0.35 | 1.13 |
| Cravath Swaine & Moore | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 839 | 1.29 | 0.03 | 0.85 |
| Hinckley Allen & Snyder | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 62 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 0.51 |
| Ropes & Gray | Apr 2007 | Text search only | 914 | 0.98 | 0.14 | 0.92 |
| McAlister & Hilbert | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| Porter & Hedges | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 108 | 1.13 | 0.36 | 1.44 |
| Sher Garner Cahill Richter Klein McAlister & Hilbert | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 6 | 1.71 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Nicole BrookshireCooley LLPFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.20× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.73×
- Stuart M. CableGoodwin ProcterFirst linked Jul 2010 · Named in a filing · 59 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.66× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- Mark L. JohnsonK&L GatesFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.19× · Went dark 1.27× · 95% wipeout 1.53×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nicole BrookshireCooley LLP | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 52 | 0.20 | 0.00 | 1.73 |
| Stuart M. CableGoodwin Procter | Jul 2010 | Named in a filing | 59 | 0.66 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| Mark L. JohnsonK&L Gates | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.19 | 1.27 | 1.53 |