APOLLO EDUCATION GROUP INC APOL (last ticker on record)
CIK 929887Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2007
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 826 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.02× · Went dark 0.18× · 95% wipeout 0.83×
- Quarles & BradyFirst linked Mar 2008 · Named in a filing · 170 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.74× · Went dark 0.70× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Snell & WilmerFirst linked Oct 1995 · Named in a filing · 244 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 1.19× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Paul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 826 | 1.02 | 0.18 | 0.83 |
| Quarles & Brady | Mar 2008 | Named in a filing | 170 | 0.74 | 0.70 | 0.79 |
| Morgan Lewis | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Snell & Wilmer | Oct 1995 | Named in a filing | 244 | 1.34 | 1.19 | 1.38 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & GarrisonFirst linked Feb 2017 · Named in a filing · 55 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.35× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.07×
- Jill Mather BartowMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.70×
- S. James DiBernardoMorgan LewisFirst linked Jun 2007 · Named in SEC correspondence · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.92× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.13×
- Daniel M. MahoneySnell & WilmerFirst linked Mar 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.25× · Went dark 2.04× · 95% wipeout 1.65×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gregory A. EzringPaul Weiss Rifkind Wharton & Garrison | Feb 2017 | Named in a filing | 55 | 0.35 | 0.00 | 1.07 |
| Jill Mather BartowMorgan Lewis | Jun 2007 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 1.70 |
| S. James DiBernardoMorgan Lewis | Jun 2007 | Named in SEC correspondence | 6 | 1.92 | 0.00 | 2.13 |
| Daniel M. MahoneySnell & Wilmer | Mar 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 2.25 | 2.04 | 1.65 |